SAE International Validation of Event Data Recorders in High Severity Full-Frontal Crash Tests 2013-01-1265

Description
This study evaluates the accuracy of 41 Event Data Recorders (EDR) extracted from model year 2012 General Motors, Chrysler, Ford, Honda, Mazda, Toyota, and Volvo vehicles subjected to New Car Assessment Program 56 kph full-frontal barrier crash tests. The approach was to evaluate (1) the vehicle longitudinal change in velocity or delta-V (\u0394V) as measured by EDRs in comparison with the high-precision accelerometers mounted onboard test vehicles and (2) the accuracy of pre-crash speed, seatbelt buckle status, and frontal airbag deployment status. On average the absolute error for pre-crash speed between the EDR and reference instrumentation was only 0.58 kph, or 1.0% of the nominal impact speed. In all cases in which the EDRs recorded the seatbelt buckle status of the driver or right front passenger, the modules correctly reported that the occupants were buckled. EDRs reported airbag deployment correctly in all of the tests. The average absolute error was 4.20 kph (6.6%) for final longitudinal\u0394V and 4.32 kph (6.6%) for maximum longitudinal \u0394V. Our results show that EDRs underreport the reference instrumentation \u0394V in the vast majority of cases.
Description
This study evaluates the accuracy of 41 Event Data Recorders (EDR) extracted from model year 2012 General Motors, Chrysler, Ford, Honda, Mazda, Toyota, and Volvo vehicles subjected to New Car Assessment Program 56 kph full-frontal barrier crash tests. The approach was to evaluate (1) the vehicle longitudinal change in velocity or delta-V (\u0394V) as measured by EDRs in comparison with the high-precision accelerometers mounted onboard test vehicles and (2) the accuracy of pre-crash speed, seatbelt buckle status, and frontal airbag deployment status. On average the absolute error for pre-crash speed between the EDR and reference instrumentation was only 0.58 kph, or 1.0% of the nominal impact speed. In all cases in which the EDRs recorded the seatbelt buckle status of the driver or right front passenger, the modules correctly reported that the occupants were buckled. EDRs reported airbag deployment correctly in all of the tests. The average absolute error was 4.20 kph (6.6%) for final longitudinal\u0394V and 4.32 kph (6.6%) for maximum longitudinal \u0394V. Our results show that EDRs underreport the reference instrumentation \u0394V in the vast majority of cases.

Suppliers

Company
Product
Description
Supplier Links
Validation of Event Data Recorders in High Severity Full-Frontal Crash Tests - 2013-01-1265 - SAE International
Warrendale, PA, United States
Validation of Event Data Recorders in High Severity Full-Frontal Crash Tests
2013-01-1265
Validation of Event Data Recorders in High Severity Full-Frontal Crash Tests 2013-01-1265
This study evaluates the accuracy of 41 Event Data Recorders (EDR) extracted from model year 2012 General Motors, Chrysler, Ford, Honda, Mazda, Toyota, and Volvo vehicles subjected to New Car Assessment Program 56 kph full-frontal barrier crash tests. The approach was to evaluate (1) the vehicle longitudinal change in velocity or delta-V (\u0394V) as measured by EDRs in comparison with the high-precision accelerometers mounted onboard test vehicles and (2) the accuracy of pre-crash speed, seatbelt buckle status, and frontal airbag deployment status. On average the absolute error for pre-crash speed between the EDR and reference instrumentation was only 0.58 kph, or 1.0% of the nominal impact speed. In all cases in which the EDRs recorded the seatbelt buckle status of the driver or right front passenger, the modules correctly reported that the occupants were buckled. EDRs reported airbag deployment correctly in all of the tests. The average absolute error was 4.20 kph (6.6%) for final longitudinal\u0394V and 4.32 kph (6.6%) for maximum longitudinal \u0394V. Our results show that EDRs underreport the reference instrumentation \u0394V in the vast majority of cases.

This study evaluates the accuracy of 41 Event Data Recorders (EDR) extracted from model year 2012 General Motors, Chrysler, Ford, Honda, Mazda, Toyota, and Volvo vehicles subjected to New Car Assessment Program 56 kph full-frontal barrier crash tests. The approach was to evaluate (1) the vehicle longitudinal change in velocity or delta-V (\u0394V) as measured by EDRs in comparison with the high-precision accelerometers mounted onboard test vehicles and (2) the accuracy of pre-crash speed, seatbelt buckle status, and frontal airbag deployment status. On average the absolute error for pre-crash speed between the EDR and reference instrumentation was only 0.58 kph, or 1.0% of the nominal impact speed. In all cases in which the EDRs recorded the seatbelt buckle status of the driver or right front passenger, the modules correctly reported that the occupants were buckled. EDRs reported airbag deployment correctly in all of the tests. The average absolute error was 4.20 kph (6.6%) for final longitudinal\u0394V and 4.32 kph (6.6%) for maximum longitudinal \u0394V. Our results show that EDRs underreport the reference instrumentation \u0394V in the vast majority of cases.

Supplier's Site

Technical Specifications

  SAE International
Product Category Standards and Technical Documents
Product Number 2013-01-1265
Product Name Validation of Event Data Recorders in High Severity Full-Frontal Crash Tests
Unlock Full Specs
to access all available technical data

Similar Products